![]() Back in August, we tested games in Parallels Desktop, a popular virtualization. ![]() Con Very expensive Parallels upgrades are very expensive. Con Gaming performance is lacking VMWare Fusions gaming performance is slightly below that of Parallels Desktop. Parallels Desktop was faster than Fusion in some individual tests, Fusion was faster in others, and in the rest the differences were almost too close to call. Gaming through virtualization on an Apple Silicon Mac is getting better with every M1 Mac release from the company. Performance comparable to Parallels Con Its not free VMware Fusion is a proprietary software that costs 79.99, although it is very good. ![]() Macworld Labs ran both programs through PCWorld’s WorldBench 6 benchmark suite, and the results were close: overall, VMware Fusion beat out Parallels Desktop by a very slight margin (113 to 118, meaning Fusion was 18 percent faster than a theoretical baseline system, Parallels Desktop 13 percent). fusion but as VMWare just released fusion 2.0 I thought it was a good time to compare the two virtualization options (I know there are others but I dont think they are mainstream, or they dont advertise well). boot camp discussions and probably some parallels vs. As noted, both Parallels Desktop and Fusion perform well when it comes to running Windows 7 on a Mac. Originally Posted by jpennington There has been a lot a parallels vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |